Monthly Archive for April, 2007

Sports coverage needs to change in this country

One thing that I don’t like much is that we don’t have the best coverage of sports in this country. Well, at least not an extremely diverse and continuous selection of different sports. It seems like the only sport ever on consistently is football, and, while it’s a good sport and I like it sometimes, I’m more of a basketball fan and more recently I’ve been discovering baseball thanks to five’s late night coverage. Five really is the only way you can watch north american sports like NBA and MLB on a semi-consistent basis. The problem is that it’s only one or two games of the chosen sport per week. Now I can’t complain about the time the shows are on because time zones can’t be helped and they are american sports so why should they play games to suit the comparitively small NBA and MLB fanbase in the UK and other countries. Of course they shouldn’t and on that front it’s all fine.

But where are HD feeds of games on UK TV? And where are more live games each week. While one free game is nice and definitely worth celebrating, it’s no where near what the US has in terms of free access to sports. The sports monopoly in this country gobbling up seemingly the rights to every sport almost is Sky Sports. Sky Sports is an expensive package on-top of your standard package and to be honest isn’t worth paying for unless you really like football, which has been shown in that many people choose to unsubscribe to Sky Sports during the summer when there is no football on.

Now in the US, as far as I know, the main networks which show sports: ESPN, abc, NBC and TNT are all free channels. Plus local channels show games of the local team if they aren’t picked up on national TV. This is definitely something we need to get in this country because right now we have virtually nothing to shout about in terms of sports coverage, unless your talking about olympics coverage because the BBC has that down to a tee.

Finally, I just want to touch on the misery that is the BBL, our sorry excuse for a basketball league in this country. It’s really just extremely dissapointing to have a league that is really struggling in terms of TV audiences and really re-establishing itself from the glory days of several years back. It hasn’t had a team representing it in the ULEB cup this year and my local team hasn’t even been competing choosing instead to take a year out and come back next season. The worst part is the TV viewership and the astonishing fact that the league has signed an exclusive deal with a channel I’ve never heard of which can’t be a good idea. What makes it worse is that firstly they don’t carry this channel on anything other than sky which takes freeview, analogue and virgin customers out of the equasion and lowers their possible audience. I’m surprised no one else gave them an offer because I would imagine that at least one of the top four or five broadcasters would be interested in showing games from the league. Four not including sky sports because I don’t consider them to be one of the majors as they aren’t available on freeview or anything else without additional charges.

The second problem they have is that now they have signed an exclusive deal with the channel, they are stuck with that channel until that contract expires before they can go anywhere else, that is if anyone else is interested. The contract may be up at the end of this season or it may be longer. I hope it isn’t a long term deal and that a deal can be reached with the BBC or five soon.

In conclusion, I hope that sometime soon, we have a better array of sporting viewing as well as all other types of TV content, in HD where applicable and we have more free channels that show these programmes or at least provide high quality programming for as lower cost as possible, but until then I’ll be keeping tuned to five or recording things if I can’t be nocturnal.

When is something going to get done about old tech patents?

Everyone knows what’s happening with the Verizon vs Vonage situation. Verizon are shamelessly using old patents that are extremely wide ranging and arguably obsolite at this point in time to cripple the competition.

This is so common and you never have to wait long for the next greedy company or individual to try to get some money or take out their rivals, depending on the situation.

I have heard so many of these cases so it’s hard to think of any to think of many, but the ones that come to the top of my head include the people who sued Microsoft, `Sony and nintendo over rumble and another company that makes remote controls that sued nintendo for the wii remote despite the company not making remotes for gaming. The only sued them over the motion sensing which is for a totally different purpose and is I’m sure not unique anyway.

Away from gaming I know Microsoft and Apple among other major manufacturers of computers and other tech products have been targetted almost constantly by patent squatters.

So in conclusion, the whole system has to be updated to make it all work fairer now that things have changed so much. Trademark law work well for the most part in that they force the trademark holding company to enforce it and take steps to protect it and stop others from using it, and also show that you are using it. An example would be where cisco were criticised for simply putting an iPhone sticker on their VOIP phones (which incidently could probably be banned if Verizon get their way). But the squabble they had with Apple is history now and the companies are working together on iPhone interoperability.

Back to the patents, I think if people are no longer allowed to sit on patents then this kind of thing won’t be able to continue happening, and companies with great products won’t have to worry about people coming along trying to rain on their parades.

The BBC iPlayer will support the Mac

I was hoping that this would happen and I also filled out the survey BBC put up a little while ago so it’s great to see it happen. I have been bashing the BBC lately with the lack of programming that I really want to watch and the tv license which I’m not a huge fan of.

This is certainly making me reconsider my position on the BBC and the license fee in the future if on demand tv viewing will be available online.

Read the article here.

Mac Pro octo core and Final Cut Studio 2 thoughts

The creative professionals now have everything they could need at this point. Not only have we finally seen the release of Adobe’s Creative Suite 3 for intel macs and the Mac Pro octo core, Apple have also released a brand new version of Final Cut Studio. The new version has a whole load of great stuff including a couple of really great things that caught my eye. The first being the ability to place a wide variety of formats on the timeline in final cut and being able to edit them together in real-time. Plus the ability to compress huge HD video files down to much smaller files is great too.

The fact that you’ll be able to get smaller HD files online and the ever increasing broadband speeds, this hopefully means that more HD content will be available online soon.

One note about the Mac Pro 8-core though is that they introduced it at an increased cost and kept the quad core versions available at the same price as before I think although I may be wrong. I was hoping that they would keep the one highest end quad model and then go all octo from there upwards in pricing while dropping the quad core’s price and introducing the octo at not too much of a premium above that but I don’t think that’s what they’ve done.

I’m just not sure if I believe that it really costs so much more to put 8 cores in there than 4 and also that the quad system hasn’t gone down in price since it was launched last year.

But then again for those professional video editors it’s a small price to pay for probably best and still the cheapest solution for high end video editing and other professional tasks.

The DRM-Free Breakthrough Finally Comes

I went to bed last night hoping that the announcement today wouldn’t just be the Beatles and would be something far more important. It turned out to be exactly the case and the DRM wall is finally starting to get smashed. Apple and EMI have announced a partnership to be the first distributers of DRM Free music from major labels.

I think I’m more relieved than anything because there’s a popular feeling that this is a long time coming. I’m not exactly sure why they have chosen the pricing they have for individual tracks and why they have left the DRM alternative available. Personally I would have prefered a more simple solution comprising of getting rid of DRM entirely and keeping the price at the same 79p or 99 cents rather than having two downloads, one cheaper with DRM and the other one slightly more but with a higher bitrate and of course, no restrictions.

The reason I don’t care about the higher bitrate is simple. I’m not an audiophile. I don’t have special speakers and as of now I don’t have any high-end earphones and even if I did I’d still be happy with the current bitrate. The basic speakers on my macbook, although they’re not that loud, do the job just fine for me.

The thing that makes up for the crappy and confusing pricing that Apple and EMI have come up with is the fact that albums will still cost the same amount DRM or not, which clearly means that albums will no longer be DRM’d at all which is nice. Especially for people like me who only ever buy albums and never individual tracks. On the other hand it’s hard to really blame apple to some extent for making things confusing because when you only have one of the major four labels supplying DRM-Free music, confusion is innevitable. They could have made it simpler though.

However, the simple fact here is that DRM is finally crumbling away and pricing structures will change in time. Therefore you can only really see today’s announcement as a very positive thing for the future growth of digital music.

I think everyone should get together and buy an EMI album in May when DRM-Free comes into effect, or maybe even today since you don’t pay any premium to upgrade your DRM’d tracks to unrestricted format. We’ve been wanting this for so long so now it’s up to us the customers to show our support for the percieved risk EMI is taking.

edit: I forgot to really touch on the format the downloads are going to be in so I’ll go over that now. Unfortunatly, this is not an entirely positive thing. Apple are going to go with AAC format which would lead people to believe that they are either aren’t going fully DRM-Free. Probably more likely however, the compression for AAC is far superior to MP3 and that’s their reasoning. I think Apple are probably going down this route because Steve did mention that he hopes this will convince people that he is serious about his anti-DRM message. I think if he was to go against his own word he would get a huge backlash from the media and I’m sure he doesn’t want that. I think what Apple are trying to do is give better quality AAC downloads with the best compression and the lowest file sizes as possible while also making their music DRM-Free.

I think Apple may be being clever and purposefuly giving people better quality downloads as well as unrestricted so that they can have a reason to use aac over mp3. However I think people will flock to start supporting AAC in their players and mobile phones if Apple are selling music in that format. It’s really the lesser of two evils.

I mean considering that now people can’t use .wma or .aac on players that only support MP3, it’s really saying that AAC has to become the format that brings all the stores and device manufacturers together, or at least one of the formats that all the main device makers have to support going forward. Despite the fact that DRM will eventually be going away for music completely, mp3, wma, aac aren’t all going to converge into one and I can’t see microsoft or anyone else dropping their format even if they do drop DRM.

What I think we will start to see soon is aac, mp3, wma and any other common formats all being included in players from iriver, samsung, sony possibly when they go drm free, toshiba and all the others including hopefully Microsoft with the Zune. I think playsforsure will continue being used by napster, rhapsody, urge, virgin digital etc for their subscription services but for music purchased to keep I think we’ll see DRM-Free from these guys.